Open Access

An Indian pediatric emergency weight estimation tool: prospective adjustment of the Broselow tape

International Journal of Emergency Medicine20158:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0078-z

Received: 28 May 2015

Accepted: 27 July 2015

Published: 4 August 2015

Abstract

Background

This study aims to remodel the Broselow Pediatric Emergency Tape for the Indian pediatric population. The Broselow tape overestimates the heights of the Indian pediatric population and remits inaccurate predicted weights for all color zones with varying degrees and could result in overresuscitation of Indian children in emergency settings. The Indian children are underweight for their age and height.

Methods

We prospectively collected cross-sectional data on a sample of 1185 children aged 1 month to 12 years old in Chennai, India. The Broselow tape was used for length-based weight estimation, and actual weight was recorded by a weighing scale. In the first stage, we recruited 769 children. With univariate linear regression, we adjusted the Broselow tape by an 8 % correction factor to enhance accuracy and created a new tape with new weight and height ranges. In the second stage, we recruited 416 children and tested the new ranges for accuracy.

Results

The Broselow tape overestimates weights with a mean percentage difference of 5–15 % depending on the color zone. Accuracy of the Broselow tape by color-coded zone was between 33–86.6 %, with higher weight color zones showing lower accuracy. The new Indian pediatric weight estimation tool (IPWET), based on the Broselow tape has a weight range of 4–36 kg and height range of 50–150 cm (Broselow tape, 3–36 kg, 46–146.5 cm) and an improved accuracy between 51–97.8 %.

Conclusions

A remodeled Broselow tape can predict weights with higher accuracy in the Indian pediatric population.

Keywords

Broselow tapeAdjustmentPediatric supine heightsWeights

Background

The need for the use of the Broselow tape as a length-based weight estimation tool in India is two-fold. Emergency medicine is an emerging field in India and an age-based weight estimation in the pediatic population during emergency intervention is more prone to dosing errors. In its current format, however, the Broselow tape cannot be utilized with optimal accuracy. The Indian children are underweight for their age and height.

The Broselow tape is deemed a practical tool that facilitates a fast weight estimation in emergency settings and may help to circumvent dosing errors. Recent studies provide ample evidence on dosing errors in pediatric emergency settings with concomitant large percentage of adverse events (AE) [14]. Manual dose calculation using dosing equations during pediatric treatment also proved to be a high-error activity [58]. The Broselow tape was developed for use in the USA to overcome such impracticalities.

In India, the age-derived weight methods using the Nelson formula or APLS in pediatrics is often used [9, 10]. However, recent studies in India indicate that such method may be erroneous.

A comparison of age-derived methods with length-based estimation of weights has demonstrated that the Broselow tape can predict dosages of resuscitation drugs with better accuracy [11]. Evidence shows that the APLS formula tend to underestimate the actual weight and the margin of error increases with age [12].

A comparative study on the Luscombe and Owens new formula and the most recent new APLS formulae has not been conducted in India. The new APLS guidelines include three new formulae that stratify the pediatric population using the original APLS for ages 1–5 years and Luscombe and Owens formulae for ages 6–12 years [13]. The Broselow tape is recommended by the Indian Academy of Pediatrics [14]. A recent study has provided us with compelling evidence that methods based on the length of the child are more accurate than age-based formulae [15].

Pediatric medication dosing has been recognized as a high-error activity with the potential to cause serious harm, and it has been found that the Broselow tape and color-coded materials would result in a decrease in deviation from recommended medication doses and equipment sizes and an increase in physician comfort level [16].

The Broselow tape correlates measured heights ranging between 46–146.5 cm to predicted weight ranges between 3–36 kg, arranged in color zones. Its predicted weight ranges are derived from pediatric anthropometric data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) between 1963–1975. The color zones are designed to predict the 50th percentile weight for height, which is an estimate of ideal body mass [17]. The tape is recommended by the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) [18] and the Pediatric Advanced Life Support in the USA and Europe [19]. The use of the Broselow tape has been the subject of several studies to validate its use [2023].

Investigation on the Broselow tape in the USA and other countries have identified either an underestimation or overestimation of body weight in pediatric emergency settings. In the USA, several studies have demonstrated an underresuscitation phenomenon. The American pediatric population is overweight for their height [24]. For this reason, the Broselow tape in the USA generates weight estimates that are found to be within 15 % of error for 79 % of children and showing a high degree of accuracy for children from 3.5 to 10 kg and from 10 to 25 kg [25].

On the contrary, the tape overestimates weights for the Indian pediatric population and would pose the risk for overresuscitation in an emergency setting. A previous prospective study determined that the Broselow tape overestimates weights in the Indian pediatric population by >10 % [26].

In our study, we validated the overestimation of predicted weights by the Broselow tape among the Indian children and remodeled it as a new Indian pediatric weight estimation tool (IPWET) that has new weight ranges and enhanced sensitivity.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, 1185 children of both sexes were recruited in two phases: phase 1 (n = 769) and phase 2 (n = 416) at the Sri Ramachandra University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Chennai, India. All participants met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This study was carried out during July–August 2009, after obtaining an informed consent from the parents or accompanying guardians. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of University hospital. The aim of the study was to remodel the Broselow tape for the Indian children. Indian children are underweight for their age and height compared to the 50 percentile data represented on each color zone of the Broselow tape.

Study setting and population

This study was conducted at Outpatient Pediatrics Department at a Sri Ramachandra University hospital in India. This tertiary hospital provides care for nearly a thousand pediatric patients per day with diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.

Inclusion criteria

The Pediatric population, aged 1 month to 12 years including both genders.

Exclusion criteria

Children having length <46 cm or height >146 cm, weighing > 36 kg, severely malnourished, or dehydrated children, and children requiring emergency care.

Study protocol

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the University Ethics Committee. Subjects’ name, age, date of birth, and reason for the visit to the clinic was recorded before the actual measurements of height and weight were taken. The weight was measured by using a digitalized weighing scale to the nearest 0.1 kg. Prior to measurement, the footwear and heavy clothing were removed. Consequently, the subject was invited to assume a supine position on a bench parallel to the Broselow tape. We used a Broselow Pediatric Emergency Tape, 2007, Edition B, Armstrong, Medical Industries, IL, USA.

Two pieces of cardboard were used to hold against the crown and heel of the subject. The red arrow on the tape was held by the crown perpendicular to the cardboard, and the predicted weight was read from the corresponding color zone and particular weight on the Broselow tape. In a similar manner, a standard measuring tape was used to measure the height of the subject and match the height to corresponding color zone. In case of children under age 1 year or those who were still too young to stand, the measurement of weight was obtained by placing the child on the infant scale. The height was measured by placing the infant on the bed in a straight supine position and holding two cardboard pieces against the crown and heel of the infant.

Prior to commencement of data collection, the scales were calibrated according to manufacturer guidelines. Ten percent of the data was measured by two investigators in blinded fashion to determine the interrater reliability.

Outcome and measures

The outcome measures for the performance of the Broselow tape included a mean percentage difference as an estimation of bias, standard deviation (SD) as a measure of precision, and percentage agreement on color-coded zones and prediction of weights based on the measured height (within 10 % of the measured weight) as a measure of tape accuracy.

Data analysis

Linear regression, ANOVA, t statistics, p value calculation, kappa value, chi-square, specificity, and sensitivity diagnostic tests were applied to analyze the data. SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze the data.

Results

Of the selected 769 children, 52.9 % (407) are boys and 47.1 % (362) are girls. The difference between the gender representation is not significant (p = 0.113). The distribution of boys and girls is equivalent in the selected subjects (Table 1). Our sample data is statistically sufficient for analysis with respect to height and weight. The correlation coefficients for the anthropometric measures in our study included the following: (a) measured weight vs. measured height (0.954), (b) measured weight vs. the Broselow tape weight (0.970), (c) measured height vs. the Broselow tape (0.978), and (d) weight measured weight vs. age (0.925). These measures indicate a high degree of positive association between actual weight and actual height with observable gender relationships between variables and show similar coefficients with a p value <0.0005.
Table 1

Descriptive statistics and selected characteristics of the subjects (n = 769)

Characteristic

Mean

SD

Age (months)

52.66

43.21

Actual weight (kg)

14.29

7.54

Actual height (cm)

96.64

26.06

Broselow weight (kg)

15.51

8.43

Estimated weight for height (from the data)

14.29

7.19

Mean weight (kg) (Broselow and Actual)

14.89

7.92

Difference in weight (kg) (Broselow − Actual)

1.23

2.15

Percent difference in weight (Actual − Broselow)

−8.49

14.59

Absolute Percent difference in weight (Actual − Broselow)

12.88

10.92

The relationship between actual height and weight for boys and girls, together with the regression line, is illustrated in Fig. 1. The coefficient of determination for boys (blue dots) is 0.899 and for girls (red dots) is 0.923, which shows the greater applicability of the values. The linear regression shows concordance between measured weights and predicted weights on the Broselow tape.
Fig. 1

Scatter plot of measured heights and measured weights (kg)

The association between actual heights and the Broselow predicted weights has a coefficient of determination of 0.954 for boys and 0.9 for girls (Fig. 2), and R 2 shows 95.4 and 90 % variability. The heights in the data sample are not congruent with the purported predicted weights by the Broselow tape. The difference between the actual weights and the predicted weights from the Broselow tape demonstrates <100 % agreement. The Broselow tape overestimates predicted weights with a mean percentage difference of 5–15 % depending on the color zone (Table 3). The accuracy by color zone was between 33–86.6 %, with higher weight color zones showing lower accuracy. There is an 8 to 14 % mismatch of measured heights to color zones on the Broselow tape (Table 2).
Fig. 2

Scatter plot of measured heights and Broselow predicted weights (kg)

Table 2

Sensitivity, specificity, kappa, and chi-square level of significance for different color zones on Broselow tape with reference to the actual weight of the children (n = 769) prior to correction

Color code

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

Kappa

Chi-square P value

Gray

69.1

98.7

0.73

0.0005*

Pink

76.3

96.4

0.72

0.0005*

Red

51.5

94.0

0.47

0.0005*

Purple

33.0

94.2

0.30

0.0005*

Yellow

68.6

93.1

0.60

0.0005*

White

54.8

94.6

0.52

0.0005*

Blue

57.1

94.1

0.51

0.0005*

Orange

48.1

93.6

0.41

0.0005*

Green

86.8

94.5

0.57

0.0005*

*p < 0.05 (p value is highly significant)

The overall difference between estimated Broselow predicted weights and actual weights in our data sample for each color zone falls within 8.49 % (Broselow weight − actual weight) × 100/actual weight). We have truncated the value to 8 % and used it as a correction factor to enhance sensitivity and the degree of agreement between measured heights and predicted weights on the tape. The correction factor reduces the Broselow predicted weights for each color zones by 8 % (Table 4). Sensitivity and kappa values demonstrate the agreement between measured weights and predicted weights. The kappa value quantifies the level of agreement between the actual weights and the Broselow predicted weights for each color-coded zone. The kappa values for our sample data are all positive and congruent with the sensitivity values. The values are >0.7, except for red, purple, and orange zones (Table 2), and statistically significant. The kappa value is not 1 because the sensitivity is not 100 %. In our scenario, sensitivity is the tape’s capacity to correctly identify and match a given height to the correct color zone on the tape. Specificity, on the other hand, is the tape’s capacity to differentiate color zones and should not assign height to the wrong color zone. Sensitivity and specificity are measures of the tape’s accuracy (Table 2).

In our data sample, the Broselow tape misclassified the heights to inaccurate predicated weights with a mean percentage difference of 5–15 % depending on the color zone. Accuracy by color-coded zone was between 33–86.6 %, with higher weight color zones showing lower accuracy. With an 8 % correction factor, the mean percentage difference was reduced by 4–7 % and reflects an improved accuracy between 51–97.8 % (Table 3, Table 4).
Table 3

Mean percentage difference for color zones (n = 769) measured weights and Broselow predicted weights before and after correction

Color

N

Mean before correction (SD)

Mean after 8 % correction (SD)

Gray

55

16.37 (20.49)

7.05 (18.84)

Pink

93

4.30 (12.98)

−4.04 (11.94)

Red

97

7.37 (17.11)

−1.2 (15.75)

Purple

91

4.39 (12.55)

−3.95 (11.55)

Yellow

121

8.81 (12.29)

0.11 (11.31)

White

104

9.86 (17.85)

1.07 (16.42)

Blue

91

11.46 (10.17)

2.54 (9.36)

Orange

79

10.78 (10.86)

1.91 (9.99)

Green

38

3.49 (11.21)

−4.79 (10.31)

Total

769

8.49 (14.59)

 
Table 4

Average measured weights, Broselow predicted weights, and 8 % reduced Broselow weights

Color zone

Measured weight (SD)

Broselow weight (SD)

8 % less Broselow weight (SD)

P value

P value

(Column 2 vs. Column 3)

(Column 2 vs.Column 4)

1

2

3

4

5

6

Gray (78)

5.02 (1.3)

4.94 (0.97)

4.54 (0.89)

0.50

0.0005

Pink (136)

7.71 (1.81)

7.74 (0.85)

7.12 (0.78)

0.80

0.0005

Red (55)

8.79 (1.04)

9.56 (0.69)

8.79 (0.63)

0.0005

0.98

Purple (113)

11.17 (1.36)

12.07 (0.91)

11.1 (0.84)

0.0005

0.44

Yellow(107)

13.8 (1.89)

14.95 (1.3)

13.76 (1.2)

0.0005

0.73

White (105)

17.69 (2.17)

19.58 (1.88)

18.01 (1.73)

0.0005

0.063

Blue (86)

22.7 (3.11)

24.72 (2.12)

22.74 (1.95)

0.0005

0.89

Orange (39)

26.8 (3.44)

29.33 (2.26)

26.98 (2.08)

0.0005

0.69

Green (50)

29.32 (3.45)

33.52 (1.83)

30.84 (1.68)

0.0005

0.003

We have quantified the overestimation of predicted weights by the Broselow tape in terms of overlapping of one color zone (Fig. 3). It is indicative of an inadequate concordance between measured height and predicted weights. The majority of overlapping occurs in one higher color zone.
Fig. 3

Color-coded zones and number of children matching in actual weights in color zones of Broselow predicted weights before correction factor of 8 %

The 8 % correction factor also enhanced the sensitivity and produced a uniform high level of specificity. The sensitivity rate is the highest on either end of the tape (gray and green colors), while the middle zone shows greater sensitivity (purple and orange colors), and the red, white, and blue colors have moderate sensitivity values.

The difference between measured weight and the Broselow predicted weight has a significant p value. The correction factor reversed the significance of the p value (Table 4, Columns 5 and 6). The gray and pink color zones measured weights are in close agreement with the Broselow predicted weights. However, as we transition to other color zones, the mean Broselow predicted weight is more than the measured weights, and the difference is statistically significant. Furthermore, the disagreement is in favor of measured weight. In other words, measured weights are greater than the predicted weights on the corrected Broselow values.

Applying ANOVA, we determined 95 % confidence interval for the measured heights for each color zone on the Broselow tape. Each color zone on the Broselow tape has a height range that does not match the measured heights of the selected sample children. In order to correct or remove the overlapping of the height, we chose the 95 % CI of measured heights in the Broselow color zones, and we have taken these new height ranges as the reference height ranges. As a result of the exercise, we reduced the overlapping of color zones (Table 4). We used the reference height ranges in a univariate generalized linear model to determine their corresponding new weight ranges (Table 4 and Table 7).

Sample size

To determine the number of new sample data for testing our new tape, we have taken the overlapping phenomenon, depicted in Fig. 3, by excluding 20 % of data on both sides of each color zone (preceding and succeeding areas), we isolated the middle zone as such that would contain non-overlapping values for each color zone. The gray zone is an exception, as there is no preceding color zone. In the process, we have determined that we need a minimum of 40 samples per color zone with a significance level of 5 % and a power of 80 %. This value translated into 360 samples for nine color zones. We used data from 769 children to drive the new height and weight ranges for IPWET.

Validation of the new height and weight ranges

We recruited an additional 416 children of both genders at the same study site to validate our findings. Our analysis confirmed that the adjusted Broselow tape (IPWET) indeed enhances the degree of agreement and kappa value with a stronger correlation between measured heights and estimated weights (Table 5 and Table 6).
Table 5

Sensitivity values for height and weight ranges of the data samples

Color

Color

Sample-1

Sample-1

Sample-2

Sample-2

Overall sample

Overall sensitivity

(height range)

(weight range)

(n = 769)

Sensitivity

(n = 416)

Sensitivity

(769 + 416 = 1185)

Gray(<64.99)

Gray (<6.49)

78

68.4

46

100

124

78.3

Pink(65–73.99)

Pink (6.5–8.49)

136

60.2

48

94.3

184

69.2

Red(74–80.99)

Red (8.5–10.49)

55

25.7

28

40.7

83

31.0

Purple(81–94.99)

Purple (10.5–12.49)

113

63.2

67

72.5

180

66.4

Yellow(95–106.99)

Yellow (12.5–15.49)

107

61.2

44

57.4

151

59.9

White(107–120.99)

White (15.5–19.49)

105

68.1

61

90.7

166

75.2

Blue(121–132.99)

Blue (19.5–24.49)

86

60.5

45

65.6

131

62.6

Orange(133–137.99)

Orange (24.4–28.49)

39

36.0

31

48.5

70

41.0

Green(138–150)

Green (28.5–36.00)

50

69.4

46

82.5

96

75.3

Total

 

769

 

416

 

1185

 
Table 6

Kappa values for individual color zones on the remodeled tape

Color

Color

Sample-1

Kappa for

Sample-2

Kappa for

Overall sample

Overall kappa

(height range)

(weight range)

(n = 769)

769

(n = 416)

416

(769 + 416 = 1185)

Gray (<64.99)

Gray (<6.49)

78

0.73

46

0.988

124

0.819

Pink (65–73.99)

Pink (6.5–8.49)

136

0.42

48

0.733

184

0.518

Red (74–80.99)

Red (8.5–10.49)

55

0.27

28

0.492

83

0.343

Purple (81–94.99)

Purple (10.5–12.49)

113

0.51

67

0.567

180

0.531

Yellow (95–106.99)

Yellow (12.5–15.49)

107

0.52

44

0.584

151

0.542

White (107–120.99)

White (15.5–19.49)

105

0.59

61

0.716

166

0.633

Blue (121–132.99)

Blue (19.5–24.49)

86

0.56

45

0.72

131

0.617

Orange (133–137.99)

Orange (24.4–28.49)

39

0.37

31

0.458

70

0.406

Green (138–150)

Green (28.5–36.00)

50

0.67

46

0.741

96

0.701

Total

 

769

 

416

 

1185

 

Limitations

Although our data sample is diverse and representative of all geographic regions and socioeconomic backgrounds in the Indian population, it is collected at one tertiary clinic. There is no comparable NCHS data pool available in India that would allow a precise estimate of height and weight for each color zone. Therefore, our correction factor may change at the aggregate or individual color zone level when we repeat the study on a very large and diverse pediatric population. In this study, we have considered only gender difference, and other categories such as social class, income, parent education level, differences in ethnicity, and regional areas are not considered in the analysis. We could not with certainty verify the age of the children in our data sample and relied on the information obtained from the parents or guardian. The future study should include Bland Altman plot and a measurement error model to provide a more informative comparison by determining the relative biases (i.e., systematic error, including differences in measurement scale, or scale bias) and imprecision (i.e., random error, adjusted for scale bias).

Discussion

Our discussion is limited to factors that may explain why Indian children are underweight for their height and support our effort to remodel the Broselow tape. Our results confirm that the Broselow tape overestimates weights with a 5–15 % mean percentage difference in the Indian children and misclassifies them into a wrong color zone on the Broselow tape, usually to a higher color zone. This finding implies overresuscitation with inaccurate dosing of emergency medications.

As the weights (kg) in our data sample decreases with increase in age, the level of sensitivity declines as well. This observation is indicative of a trend that with increased age, the Indian children become more underweight for their heights (Table 2).

There are several possible reasons for this trend. Numerous surveys and studies have focused on the level of nourishment, exclusive breast-feeding (EBF), socioeconomics, and low birth weight. In our current analysis, we devoted our attention to these contributory factors to highlight current data and their relevance to lag in ideal height-for-weight and weight-for-age in the Indian pediatric population.

In a recent survey in southern India, where our study was conducted, one study has determined that the prevalence of undernutrition (≤80 percentage of standard weight for age) was 66.5 %. Such prevalence tends to increase with age and there is a stark difference between male (76.9 %) and female (56.3 %) genders. The prevalence of grade 1 malnourishment was 46.2 %. The prevalence decreased as the socioeconomic status improved and the duration of EBF had an influence on the nutritional status of the growing child [27].

The breast-feeding policy, instituted in 1992, and the Global Strategy for “Infant and Young Child Feeding” (IYCF) initiated in 2002, have not helped to reduce the level of Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM) and Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) including Edematous SAM (E-SAM) among children in India under 5 years of age. Recently, the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) in India revealed staggering data assessing child growth that showed 43 % of children were underweight, 48 % were stunted, 20 % were wasted, and 7.9 % had severe wasting [28]. The NFHS-3 survey during 2005–2006 concluded that the rate of EBF at 6 months of age in the Indian infants was only 46.4 % [29].

WHO and UNICEF recommend the use of secondary source of human milk as the first alternative for mothers unable to breast-feed. In 2013, India took initiatives to draft comprehensive guidelines to establish human milk banks (HMB). Today, there are only 14 HMB throughout India to provide human milk for mothers who are unable to adequately breast-feed their infants [30].

Another unique challenge to the growth of children is the high rate of very low birth weight (VLBW) in India (20 %) that causes a significant mortality and morbidities and most probably affects the normal growth [31]. Pregnant women in resource-poor areas are at risk of multiple micronutrient deficiencies, and indicators of low Vitamin B12 status have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including anemia, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth retardation [32, 33]. Results show that mother nutritional status is the most important determinant of newborn child birth weight in India. Safe drinking water, use of antenatal care, and iron deficient anemia were also significant contributors to low birth weight. In addition, the mother BMI impact is more pervasive across India than the impact of other factors on birth weight [34].

Furthermore, there is a correlation between nutritional knowledge, maternal education status, and birth weight in poor communities in the Indian urban slum areas. In one pilot study, nutritional grading was done through a scoring system to demonstrate the relationship among the aforementioned factors. The study showed 47 mothers (24.1 %) out of 195 mothers having normal nutritional grade while 37 mothers (19 %) having severe nutritional grade. There were 80 mothers having “no knowledge of maternal nutrition.” Adequate knowledge was found in 31 cases. Mothers (n = 80) with “no knowledge of maternal nutrition” delivered babies of average weight 2.3 kg, whereas “adequate knowledge” mothers gave birth to babies of average weight 2.9 kg [35].

Several studies have cited the benefits of early breast-feeding and its link with a reduced risk of obesity compared with formula feeding [36]. There is a correlation between the percent of maternal ideal weight and lipid concentration in maternal milk during 6–12-months postpartum growth period that is linked to subsequent leaner body mass in the growing child [37]. However, analysis of data linking the impact of breast-feeding and lower body mass in the Indian pediatric population does not exist. In general, breastfed children in the developing world can achieve similar growth as those in the developed world when similar socioeconomic and nutritional criteria are met [38].

Currently, three quarters of the Indian pediatric population are underweight. During 1998–1999, a study found over 73 % of Indian children <3 years of age to be underweight for their height [39, 40]. Such findings are related to socioeconomic status among Indian children, and children from affluent status show similar growth patterns prevalent in the developed countries [41]. In the past five decades, community medicine in India has made tremendous strides in the field of preventive medicine. We are convinced that the lag behind the normal growth curve in the Indian pediatric population will change as new and more rigorous growth promoting strategies are being implemented. In the future, similar to the readjustment of the Broselow tape for the children in the USA due to a higher prevalence of obesity, our remodeled tape will be readjusted for the Indian children as their height-for-age and weight-for-age change due to changes in their nutrition status.

Conclusions

Our remodeled tape (IPWET) has a higher accuracy between 51–97.8 % compared to 33–86.6 % accuracy rate of the Broselow tape that decreases with higher weight color zones when used for the Indian pediatric population. The new tape has a weight range of 4–36 kg and a height range of 50–150 cm vs. weight range of 3–36 kg and height range of 46–146.5 cm on the Broselow tape (Table 7).
Table 7

Broselow predicted weights and heights vs. new estimated weights and corresponding heights for Indian pediatric population

Color zone

Broselow

Broselow

New

Estimated

height range (cm)

weight range (kg)

height range (cm)

weight range (kg)

Gray

46–59.4

3–5

50–64.99

4–6

Pink

59.5–66.5

6–7

65–73.99

7–8

Red

66.5–74

8–9

74–80.99

9–10

Purple

74–84.5

10–11

81–94.99

11–12

Yellow

84.5–97.5

12–14

95–106.99

13–15

White

97.5–110

15–18

107–120.99

16–19

Blue

110–120.75

19–23

121–132.99

20–24

Orange

120.75–133.4

24–29

133–137.99

25–28

Green

133.4–146.5

30–36

138–150.00

29–36

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Mary K. Gerth for her kind assistance to edit this paper. We are also indebted to Dr. Quilong of University of Ottawa and Dr. Richard Day of University of Pittsburgh, Department of Statistics, for their valuable suggestions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Community Medicine, Sri Ramachandra University, College of Medicine & Research Institute

References

  1. Kaushal R, Bates DW, Landrigan C. Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA. 2001;285(16):2114–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Garfield S, Reynolds M, Dermont L, Franklin BD. Measuring the severity of prescribing errors: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2013;36(12):1151–7. doi:10.1007/s40264-013-0092-0.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sharek PJ, Classen D. The incidence of adverse events and medical error in pediatrics. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2006;53(6):1067–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Davey AL, Britland A, Naylor RJ. Decreasing pediatric prescribing errors in a district general hospital. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(2):146–9. doi:10.1136/qshc.2006.021212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fortescue EB, Kaushal R, Landrigan CP, McKenna KJ, Clapp MD, Federico F, et al. Prioritizing strategies for preventing medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. Pediatrics. 2003;111(4 Pt 1):722–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Peth Jr HA. Medication errors in the emergency department: a systems approach to minimizing risk. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003;21(1):141–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lesar TS, Briceland L, Stein DS. Factors related to errors in medication prescribing. JAMA. 1997;277:312–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Koren G, Barzilay Z, Greenwald M. Tenfold errors in administration of drug doses: a neglected iatrogenic disease in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 1986;77(6):848–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Needlman RD, Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 17th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2004. p. 31.Google Scholar
  10. Mackway-Jones K, Molyneux E, Phillips B, Wieteska S. Advanced pediatric life support. London: BMJ Books; 2001.Google Scholar
  11. Varghese A, Vasudevan VK, Lewin S, Indumathi CK. Do the length-based (Broselow®) tape, APLS, Argall and Nelson’s formulae accurately estimate weight of Indian children? Bangalore, India. Indian Pediatr. 2006;43(10):889–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Luscombe M, Owens B. Weight estimation in resuscitation: is the current formula still valid? Arch Dis Child. 2007;92(5):412–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Advanced Life Support Group, Advanced Pediatric Life Support. The practical approach. 5th ed. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ldt.; 2011.Google Scholar
  14. Janakiraman L. Pediatric Advanced Life Support Group of the Indian Academy of Pediatrics. PALS guidelines. Indian Pediatr. 2001;38:872–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Black K, Barnett P, Wolfe R, Young S. Are methods used to estimate weight in children accurate? Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2002;14:160–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Shah AN, Frush K, Luo X, Wears RL. Effect of an intervention standardization system on pediatric dosing and equipment size determination: a crossover trial involving simulated resuscitation events. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(3):229–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Traub SL, Kichen L. Estimating ideal body mass in children. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1983;40:107–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS®): Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 9th edition, 2003:74(5)1363–66.Google Scholar
  19. Leon MDC, Ricardo A, MD Samson, Stephen M, MD Schexnayder, Mary F, RN HazinskiPediatric. Pediatric Advanced Life Support: Provider Manual Pap/Crds P Edition.Google Scholar
  20. Hamil PW, Drizl TA, et al. Physical growth: National Center for Health Statistics percentiles. Am J Clinical Archives. 1979;32:607–29.Google Scholar
  21. Luten RC, Wears RL, Broselow J, et al. Length-based endotracheal tube and emergency equipment in pediatrics. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(8):900–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nieman CT, Manacci CF, Super DM, Mancuso C, Fallon Jr WF. Use of the Broselow tape may result in the underresuscitation of children. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(10):1011–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lubitz DS, Seidel JS, Chameides L, Luten RC, Zaritsky AL, Campbell FW. A rapid method for estimating weight and resuscitation drug dosages from length in the pediatric age group. Ann Emerg Med. 1988;17(6):576–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramarajan N, Krishnamoorthi R, Strehlow M, Quinn J, Mahadevan SV. Internationalizing the Broselow tape: how reliable is weight estimation in Indian children. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(5):431–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. R A, Sivanandham R, Salome SD, Francis R, Sampavi DR, Prasad R. Nutritional status of children aged 3-6 years in a rural area of Tamilnadu. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(10):JC01–4.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. International Institute for Population Studies (IIPS) and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3). 2005–2006. IIPS, Mumbai, India, 2007. http://www.rchiips.org/nfhs. Accessed December 2014.
  27. NFHS-3 2005–2006. http://www.rchiips.org/nfhs. Accessed April 05, 2015.
  28. Bharadva K, Tiwari S, Mishra S, Mukhopadhyay K, Yadav B, Agarwal RK, et al. Human milk banking guidelines. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51(6):74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Das BK, Mishra RN, Mishra OP, Bhargava V, Prakash A. Comparative outcome of low birth weight babies. Indian Pediatr. 1993;30:15–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Duggan C, Srinivasan K, Thomas T, Samuel T, Rajendran R, Muthayya S, et al. Vitamin B-12 supplementation during pregnancy and early lactation increases maternal, breast milk, and infant measures of Vitamin B-12 status. J Nutr. 2014;144(5):758–64.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Dharmalingam A, Navaneetham K, Krishnakumar CS. Nutritional status of mothers and low birth weight in India. Maternal Child Health J. 2010;14(2):290–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sur D, Mukhopadhyay SP, Biswas R. Impact of nutrition education on health of the mother and newborn belonging to the poor urban slum community. J Indian Med Assoc. 1997;95(7):424–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin RM, Whincup PH, Smith GD, Cook DG, Owen CG. Effect of infant feeding on the risk of obesity across the life course: a quantitative review of published evidence. Pediatrics. 2005;115(5):1367–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen LA, Peerson JM, Lonnerdal B. Breast fed infants are leaner than formula fed infants at 1 yr of age: the DARLING study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993;57:140–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mukhopadhyay SP, Biswas R. Impact of nutrition education on health of the mother and newborn belonging to the poor urban slum community. J Indian Med Assoc. 1997;95(7):424–5Google Scholar
  36. Oddy WH. Infant feeding and obesity risk in the child. Breastfeed Rev. 2012;20(2):7–12. Review. PMID: 22946146.Google Scholar
  37. Agarwal KN, Agarwal DK, Benakappa DG, et al. Growth performance of affluent Indian children (under-fives). Growth standard for Indian children. Scientific Report 1991. New Delhi: Nutrition Foundation of India; 1991.Google Scholar
  38. Mercedes de Onis, Ray Yip. The WHO growth chart: historical considerations and current scientific issues, http://www.who.int/childgrowth/publications/WHO_growth_charts.pdf. Accessed December 2014.
  39. de Onis M. Updates on the implementation of the WHO child growth standards, nutrition and growth. World Rev Nutr Diet Basel, Karger. 2013;106:75–82.Google Scholar
  40. Habicht JP, Martorell R, Yarbrough C, Malina R, Klein RE. Height and weight standards for pre-school children. How relevant are ethnic differences in growth potentials? Lancet. 1974;I:611–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Graitcher PL, Gentry EM. Measuring children: one reference for all. Lancet. 1981;ii:297–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Asskaryar and Shankar. 2015

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.