Open Access

Epidural hematoma following spinal cord stimulator implant

  • Brian T. Kloss1Email author,
  • Anne Marie Sullivan2 and
  • Elliot Rodriguez1
International Journal of Emergency Medicine20103:174

DOI: 10.1007/s12245-010-0174-z

Received: 23 December 2009

Accepted: 25 February 2010

Published: 18 May 2010

A 50-year-old male with chronic low-back pain presented to the ED with mid-back pain, numbness, paresthesia and weakness in both legs. These symptoms were preceded by a sudden onset of paralysis below the waistline without loss of bowel or bladder control, which occurred during the surgical placement of a neurostimulator. The device was immediately removed, and the patient’s paralysis partially resolved. He transitioned into his current symptom complex. He was immediately transferred to the ED for evaluation. Physical exam showed stable vital signs, tenderness to palpation in the spine, decreased sensation T12 and below, 4/5 strength in the lower extremities, and 2+ distal pulses, intact peri-anal sensation but decreased rectal tone. MRIs of the thoracic and lumbar spines were obtained, revealing an epidural hematoma from T8–L2.

The MRI results shown in Fig. 1 display abnormal signal posterior to the spinal cord (A) that is predominantly hyperintense to the spinal cord on this T2-weighted image. There is compression of the cord at the T8 vertebral body level (A). No abnormal signal is seen within the cord itself. Epidural fat (B) and CSF (C) reveal that the hematoma is in the epidural space displacing the dura anteriorly. Figure 2 is a T1-weighted image revealing an abnormal signal (D) that is predominantly isointense to the spinal cord, again demonstrating compression of the cord. Lastly, Fig. 3 shows an axial T1-weighted image that shows abnormal signal within the spinal canal (E) compressing the spinal cord (*).
Fig. 1

T2-weighted MRI in the sagittal view. Abnormal signal posterior to the spinal cord (A) is predominantly hyperintense to the spinal cord on this T2-weighted image. There is compression of the cord at the T8 vertebral body level (A). No abnormal signal is seen within the cord itself. Epidural fat (B) and CSF (C) reveal that the hematoma is in the epidural space displacing the dura anteriorly

Fig. 2

T1-weighted MRI in the sagittal view. Abnormal signal (D) is predominantly isointense to the spinal cord, again demonstrating compression of the cord

Fig. 3

T1-weighted MRI cross-sectional view. Abnormal signal within the spinal canal (E) compresses the spinal cord (*)

The patient underwent an emergent hematoma evacuation and concurrent T6–L1 laminectomy with in situ fusion. He tolerated the procedure well and was discharged 6 days later to a rehabilitation facility with some improvement to his lower extremity strength, sensation and bladder and rectal control.

Epidural hematoma formation after placement of an epidural spinal cord electrode is an extremely rare and serious complication. Our PubMed search only yielded two similar cases in the published literature, neither of which was in English [1, 2].

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Department of Emergency Medicine
(2)
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Department of Radiology
(3)
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Department of Emergency Medicine

References

  1. Franzini A, Ferroli P, Marras C, Broggi G (2005) Huge epidural hematoma after surgery for spinal cord stimulation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147(5):565–567View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Santiago FM, Santiago J, Prieto M et al (2005) Dorsal epidural hematoma after implantation of a dorsal nerve stimulator. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 52(7):440–441PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2010

Advertisement