The coffee bean sign
© Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2009
Received: 23 May 2009
Accepted: 29 September 2009
Published: 20 November 2009
The patient was diagnosed with sigmoid volvulus. Sigmoid volvulus is the third leading cause of large bowel obstruction, behind cancer and diverticulitis . Her CT scan revealed marked distention of the sigmoid colon and rectum with abundant stool in the rectum. The coronal image demonstrated a twisted loop of sigmoid with two air-filled compartments and a central double wall ending at the point of the twist, referred to as the “coffee bean” sign. This has also been observed in abdominal X-rays and is highly suggestive of sigmoid volvulus . The diagnostic accuracy of plain X-rays ranges from 30 to 90%, depending on the experience of the interpreting physician . When an X-ray is equivocal, contrast enema or a CT scan can be helpful . Pseudo-obstruction and cecal volvulus can mimic sigmoid volvulus radiographically; however, this is rare .
Given the risk of gut ischemia, necrosis, and perforation, prompt management of sigmoid volvulus is warranted. Management with rectal tube placement can often be attempted. Surgery is recommended for patients with signs of bowel gangrene, peritonitis, or who fail nonoperative management . Our patient and her family opted for comfort care only.
- Lal SK, Morgenstern R, Vinjirayer EP, Matin A (2006) Sigmoid volvulus an update. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 16(1):175–187View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee YS, Lee WJ (2008) Coffee-bean sign. CMAJ 178(13):1657PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tiah L, Goh SH (2006) Sigmoid volvulus: diagnostic twists and turns. Eur J Emerg Med 13(2):84–87View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Catalano O (1996) Computed tomographic appearance of sigmoid volvulus. Abdom Imaging 21(4):314–317View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feldman D (2000) The coffee bean sign. Radiology 216(1):178–179View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oren D, Atamanalp SS, Aydinli B et al (2007) An algorithm for the management of sigmoid colon volvulus and the safety of primary resection: experience with 827 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 50(4):489–497View ArticleGoogle Scholar